Showing posts with label State Defense Force. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Defense Force. Show all posts

Monday, December 12, 2011

Born from humble beginnings, the National Guard celebrates its 375th birthday

By Bill Boehm
National Guard Bureau
 
ARLINGTON, Va. (12/12/11) – The Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded in 1630. More than 5,000 men, women, and children made the two-month voyage to the New World, leaving the relative comfort and safety of England behind in an effort to break free of religious intolerance, and to manage their communities the way they saw fit. In doing so, their actions tread new ground in the country that would become the United States of America.
 
The military organization we know today as the National Guard came into existence with a direct declaration on December 13, 1636. On this date, the Massachusetts General Court in Salem, for the first time in the history of the North American continent, established that all able-bodied men between the ages of 16 and 60 were required to join the militia. The North, South, and East Regiments were established with this order. The decree excluded ministers and judges. Simply stated, citizen-soldiers who mustered for military training could be and would be called upon to fight when needed.
 
Laws often evolve from well-intentioned actions, yet sometimes prove themselves to be ineffective. Given such odds, how could this possibly work?
 
Owing to many failures in the time that English settlers had attempted colonization in the Massachusetts frontier and elsewhere in North America, leaders decided that a proactive and ready state of mind must be kept by all citizens, particularly those training in military tactics. Being part of citizenry in the small villages meant that a price must be paid for the freedoms that could potentially be enjoyed, were the colony to ultimately succeed. That price exacted meant taking responsibility for defending the settlements of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
 
The settlers of the new outposts experienced austere surroundings. With no established or familiar conventions upon which to rely, the colony relied upon male pioneers to provide food, shelter, and defensive protection for the women and children present, as well for themselves. Even with all available hands working, this was a difficult task. Worse, the nearby Pequot Indian tribe proved a restless and unpredictable neighbor, leaving the Massachusetts colonists vulnerable to guerilla-style attacks that could decimate the fledgling settlements. In an environment rife with disease, poor sanitation, and harsh weather conditions, all able-bodied members of the Massachusetts colony pulled together out of necessity.
 
Self-sufficiency proved instrumental. In a new land, hiring mercenary fighters in the European tradition to ward off Indian attacks would be impossible. For one thing, the colonists had no money. Other foreign interests in the New World such as the French or Spanish, even if they were available for defensive purposes, did not share English views on religion and political matters. They would have seriously undermined the stability of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Governing and policing the settlement would have to be left to the colonists themselves. Therefore, the militia system of self-defense brought from England had the best chance of succeeding for the colonists.
 
And it did succeed. Soon after the establishment of the militia in Massachusetts, the entire New England region defended itself against the aggression of the Pequot nation. Other colonies such as Connecticut and Rhode Island mustered militia units to fight the Indian tribe, and succeeded in forcing the Pequots to capitulate in 1638. Ultimately, the militia enlisted from the many small villages proved a strong component in building confidence for the settlement as a whole.
 
Although other colonial settlements in North America such as those in Florida, Virginia, and New Mexico that would become part of the United States utilized military protection in order to allow settlers safe passage and to defend against aggressors, Massachusetts proved to be the first entity to have its government establish and raise a militia. Nor did these other colonies’ militia service remain continuous. The tie to legal precedent in this manner remains to this day. That record of service has remained continuous and unbroken, no matter the change in each unit’s function as a part of the militia or the National Guard.
 
This distinction qualifies it as the birthplace of the militia in the United States. With the North, South, and East Regiments established, its exemplary military tradition continues through this day with four Massachusetts National Guard units – the 101st Engineer Battalion, the 101st Field Artillery, the 181st Infantry Regiment, and the 182nd Infantry Regiment. The tradition born in Salem continues today.
 
Today, Massachusetts’ population numbers 6.5 million people, and the Commonwealth figures prominently as a center of manufacturing, electronics/technology, and finance. Much has changed since 1636, but one thing has not: the National Guard still consists of Citizen-Soldiers and Airmen providing protection from natural disaster, training regularly to uphold high standards of readiness, and also deploying to far-away countries to protect the United States’ national interests abroad. Although the country’s growth and expansion has made it a large military force around the world, the National Guard still remains a community cornerstone – just as it did when it was given birth on December 13, 1636.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Even Anti-War and Anti-Military Activists Should Celebrate Our Veterans

By Zach Foster
 
November 11th is a special day when citizens across the country are given time to be with their friends and family and reflect on the service, the courage, and the sacrifices made by veterans of our armed forces, as well as those of friendly nations’ armed forces who may also dwell within our borders.
 
While most citizens are content to honor veterans through a sense of patriotism and nationalism instilled in them by their parents, many people either don’t observe Veteran’s Day (and they don’t thank veterans for their service), or actively oppose the institution of such a holiday and its practices.  They make an argument about foreign occupation or imperialism and conclude that they can’t or won’t thank veterans and active duty service members who really aren’t fighting for America’s freedom.
 
The truth is quite the opposite!
 
Many of the people who disagree with the “fighting for our freedom” philosophy highly disagree with America’s foreign policy and are skeptical of the actions and policies of our government (as they should be, since critical thinking is necessary to defend one’s individual liberty).  Nonetheless, they can safely conclude that the actions of government are not performed to serve citizens but rather to serve the government.  They can also conclude that governments will start wars in order to further their own policies, regardless of whether they have volunteer armies or conscripted armies, and regardless of an all-volunteer military being the law, most citizens quietly know that the government could easily reinstate the military draft during a panic or an unpopular war.
 
Therefore, every man and woman who volunteered to serve in the armed forces and the defense forces, and also every man and woman drafted, whether serving in war or in peace, was one less chance that someone else would be drafted.  Furthermore, the million or more service members who wear the uniform today, despite knowing full well that they may fall in combat, represent one million or more chances that someone else won’t be drafted to serve against their will, ensuring that others truly enjoy the freedom to live their lives to the fullest, knowing that their life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will not be impeded.
 
In the spirit of such individual freedom, even those who choose not to serve in the armed forces, or those who oppose America’s current wars, should celebrate our nation’s veterans.
 
“Thank you.”