West Wing Week is your guide to everything that's happening at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. This week, President Obama held town halls in northern Virginia, California, and Nevada, to speak directly to the American people about his vision for reducing our debt and bringing down our deficit based on the values of shared responsibility and shared prosperity.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Thursday, April 21, 2011
A Statement on Labor Unions
By Zach Foster
Civil liberties were assaulted in Wisconsin with the union busting legislation that passed despite epic protests. At this point the purpose of the bill, the organizations it targeted, and the motives for the assault are irrelevant. The author will analyze them in writing later on. The purpose of this statement is to decry the great tragedy which occurred and spawned other tragedies in quick succession. Why would the ultraconservatives want to break the unions? Their political camp and its motives more and more resemble the totalitarianism of Communism. Capitalism with minimal regulation is vital to a free economy, and labor unions are an essential mechanism in the labor world. By no means should labor unions dominate industries, but they should merely influence them and be allowed to do so without the dead weight of government crushing civil liberties.
The late and great Senator Barry Goldwater wrote in his book The Conscience of a Conservative that labor unions and politics do not belong together at all and should not be combined. He writes:
“I believe that unionism, kept within its proper and natural bounds, accomplishes a positive good for the country. Unions can be an instrument for achieving economic justice for the working man. Moreover, they are an alternative to, and thus discourage State Socialism. Most important of all, they are an expression of freedom. Trade unions properly conceived, is an expression of man’s inalienable right to associate with other men for the achievement of legitimate objectives.”
In that chapter, Goldwater denounces both big government intruding on the worker’s right to free association and the large unions with political power that begin to resemble a second government behemoth. The only relationship labor unions should have with government is a quasi-symbiotic one in which the legislature sets the standards for what is illegal in the work place (via a law) while the unions decide what is unjust in the work place. Government should not interfere with unions (unless a law is explicitly being broken) and unions should by no means get involved with politics.
Particular unions should be opposed when they begin to cripple the industry whose workers they represent. It is fully acceptable to fight for workers to have a work day not unreasonably long, for livable wages, and certain benefits. However, there is a certain point where the benefits need to end, such as wages that are too high, both for the skill level of the labor being paid for and the employer’s ability to pay. While there are certainly big businesses and executives out there that truly are greedy and pay the absolute minimum they can get away with (such as the now bankrupt and lawsuit-plagued Hollywood Entertainment Corporation, host of Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video, and Game Crazy stores), most employers are reasonable employers and the wages they pay reflect both the skill level of the labor being hired and the amount that the employer is able to spend. If a union pressures and strong arms a small business owner (or even a large corporation) to pay janitors and cashiers $15.00 an hour with full benefits, or for middle management secretaries to be paid $200,000 a year, then the business will be unreasonable burdened. At this point an employer has three options: dramatically raise prices, hurting the clientele and customers; cut back many hours or even lay off workers; or simply go out of business because the cost of running a business are too high, thus hurting the economy, the employer, and the very workers the big union claims to represent, and by this time, the union is a second government and the union leaders are bureaucrats, businessmen, and politicians all in one. Despite the behemoth nature of big unions, most unions are very productive organizations run by honorable people—workers themselves—that simply boost the quality of life for workers without harming industry or the economy.
It is a travesty that big government steps in and violates the rights of citizens to freely associate and do business. It is normal for Democrats and even Socialists to advocate government as a remedy for every ill, but for Republicans—the party of less government—to advocate government interference in matters where it does not yet belong (after all, no laws have been broken) is a travesty. Another tragedy spawned by government violating the rights of Americans is that those who feel violated by the Republican Party flee to the Democratic Party—the party of more government—for solace. Worse yet, some of the disgruntled Americans tune into the flawed Socialist/Communist “consciousness” of oppressed labor, of class consciousness, and of class struggle (class warfare and open warfare).
Again, these remarks are theoretical, and the author will analyze the circumstances of the Wisconsin debacle later.
OCGOP Chairman Scott Baugh calls for resignation of member as a result of racist email
April 18, 2011
Citing the grossly insensitive and racist email forwarded by OCGOP Central Committee member Marilyn Davenport, Scott Baugh called on her to apologize and to step down from her elected Central Committee position. Baugh does not believe her half-hearted apology after the incident reflected the magnitude of the offense.
Statement of California Democratic Party Chairman John Burton on Racist and Offensive E-mail Distributed by Orange County Republican Central Committee Delegate and Tea Party Activist
The recent e-mail communication distributed by Orange County Republican Central Committee delegate Marilyn Davenport depicting President Obama as a chimpanzee is racist, it's offensive and it's flat out wrong. Orange County Republican leaders have forcefully condemned the communication and have called on Davenport to resign from her post.
However, as of this morning neither the website of the California Republican Party nor the Republican National Committee have posted a statement condemning this racist communication which has no place in decent society, not to mention in our political discourse. Republican members of the California Legislature have been strangely silent on the issue as well.
CRP Statement on President Obama's Latest California Campaign Swing
SACRAMENTO-- California Republican Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro today issued the following statement:
"It's obvious that the President prefers fundraising over providing the disciplined leadership America needs to get back on track. To pull off six fundraising events in 48 hours means you're really working at being greedy."
Open for Questions: Earth Day Chat on the South Lawn
In honor of Earth Day, Nancy Sutley, Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, and Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, hosted a special Open for Questions event live from the South Lawn of the White House today at 4:30 p.m. EDT.
If you’ve got questions about what the Obama Administration is doing to protect our air and water or how we’re building a clean energy future, be sure to tune in to WhiteHouse.gov/live to watch and participate.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Allegory of the Cave and American Politics, part 4
By Zach Foster
Continued from Part 3
Let us examine the sights and sounds being experienced within the cave, both the prisoners chained to the cavern wall and by the escapee who has seen the light. Americans are turning their focus to the 2012 Presidential elections which, as of April 2011, have four main candidates. Barack Obama is running for reelection and has the support of the Democratic Party. The three likely Republican candidates are Donald Trump, Herman Cain, and Ron Paul.
The author has already torn apart Trump’s charade as Republican Presidential material which, frankly, is an insult to the intelligence of every free-thinking American who is neither chained to the wall, looking at shadows, nor blissfully ignorant of being imprisoned in the web of media lies. Arguments condemning Trump have been lightly touched upon here but in greater detail in the above-recommended article (“Why Barack Obama Will Be Reelected”).
The next most popular potential nominee is the author and businessman Herman Cain, whose biography and résumé truly command respect and admiration. Cain’s life story speaks volumes in contradicting the dogmatic Marxist religion by proving that in the United States it is in fact possible for a poor boy to overcome both racial prejudice and poverty, and transcend class barriers to become wealthy through hard work and determination. Some call it luck; others call it capitalism—the author prefers to call it the American Dream. Cain has worked as a mathematician for the Department of the Navy, chaired large companies, and advised the President of the United States on economic matters. Many Conservatives are in love with Cain both for his Conservative platform and personal accomplishments. The author is also impressed with Cain, but slightly distraught that he has never once held a seat in public office. Seldom have junior politicians been successful without at least some experience in lower-level public office, and going straight from CEO to President of the United States may be a bit too much for a novice to handle. Cain’s résumé does not qualify him for the Presidency. However, given his vast experience in the private sector, he would make an outstanding Secretary of Commerce or Secretary of Labor. It would be a great shame if the next President did not have Cain in the Cabinet.
The selection of Cain also could also lead one to make additional conclusions. Though Cain has an impressive history and a solid Conservative platform of ideas, he is not the only Republican hopeful that boasts such attributes—not by a long shot. One might remember that a large contributing factor to Obama’s 2008 election was his race. Americans still felt the stigma of racism and its painful legacy and saw in Obama a perceived way to overcome it. Such suspicions would be confirmed by the extensive media coverage (more of a jubilee) making a big deal that for the first time America had a black President. While it was certainly impressive to many within America and around the world that the ball and chain of racial prejudice and discrimination, as well as interracial distrust, had largely disappeared, the author has believed for years that racism did not fade away during campus protests and sit-ins demonstrations, but rather in the mountains of Korea and the jungles of Vietnam as white, black, Asian, and Hispanic soldiers fought to save each other’s lives.
Still, Americans were glad that they had their ethnic minority President. Now as 2012 approaches, it seems highly likely that the GOP is fumbling through the directory of honorable Republican politicians—each with virtually the same qualifications—and picking a token ethnic minority to run against the incumbent ethnic minority, who was the Democratic Party’s token minority whose job it was to wave a magic wand and erase the national guilt trip. One might also believe that Cain is the last-minute replacement for former GOP National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, who may have been intended to be the GOP’s secret weapon for 2012.
The tragedy of this trend of Messianic politics, which has expanded from the realm of working miracles to also include the realm of race and ethnicity, is that it does a huge discredit to the individuals on the ballot who are being used. This trend of propping up a candidate simply for the convenience of their race is perhaps the most racist action of all, and selecting a candidate simply because of gender is the most sexist thing of all. The candidates themselves, who have worked hard all of their lives and who are intelligent people with perhaps some very good ideas are being used like commodities, or even worse, must endure a personality cult being placed on their shoulders and pressuring them to work miracles. Honestly, how realistic was the rush of the Hope and Change high of 2008? What made Obama different from Ken Salazar, John Lewis, or Sanford Bishop? Today, what makes Cain different from Allen West, Marco Rubio, or Bobby Jindal?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)