Showing posts with label great depression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label great depression. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

Two Years of Job Growth - Share Your Story


The private sector has added jobs for two straight years. This chart demonstrates how our economy is recovering from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Behind each of these numbers is the story of a business adding new members to their team or of an unemployed worker finding a new job to help support their family. But we also know that we need to do more.

Help illustrate the progress we’ve made over the last two years and the importance of continuing to strengthen our economy and create jobs in the months and years ahead:

Tell us your story at WhiteHouse.gov/JobStories

Thursday, November 3, 2011

What a Jobs Plan Looks Like

By  Dan Pfeiffer
 
As we continue to climb out of the worst recession since the Great Depression and Americans continue to struggle, it is clear that the need for continued action is urgent. There are things that Washington can do right now to create jobs and grow the economy, and the President has put together the American Jobs Act to do exactly that.
 
Unfortunately, even as the President is doing all he can through his executive powers in the "We Can't Wait" campaign, the American Jobs Act is being blocked by Republicans in the Senate who have voted in unison against these common sense, broadly supported proposals, and Republicans in the House refuse to even give the bill a vote.  Senate Republicans have offered their own alternative as an excuse to oppose the President's plan, but a look at them side by side leads to only one conclusion: one is truly a jobs plan, and one is not.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the GOP Presidential Debate

By DNC Press

Following the Republican presidential debate tonight, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz released the following statement:

"If you're a middle-class family looking for opportunity the GOP field once again offered no solutions tonight. There was not a single serious proposal to create jobs, not a single plan to increase opportunity for the middle class and not a single new idea to get our economy moving again.

"What the American people saw tonight was all of the Republican candidates reaffirming their allegiance to the extreme ideology of the Tea Party.   On issue after issue, Tea Party beliefs are taking hold of the Republican Party as they continually put the well-being of corporations, big oil, and special interests ahead of middle class Americans.

"Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, and the rest of the candidates on stage continued advocating for policies that protect tax cuts for corporations, special interests and the wealthiest Americans who bankroll their campaigns all while shifting more and more burdens onto working and middle-class Americans. The Republican candidates all support draconian cuts to infrastructure, research and development, education and health care that would halt economic growth and cost millions of Americans their jobs. The Republican Party has pushed these policies before and it led our country to the brink of a second Great Depression.

"That's not what the American people need.  Americans are looking for Republicans to offer answers—but all the country got tonight was more of the same with a flavor of Tea."

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

“Buy American Only?” A Letter From a Concerned Citizen

By Zach Foster
This excellent article was also featured on Only the Money! Blog

Dear [friend], thank you so much for writing to me with your concerns.  I happen to share your deep concern for the fate of working class America, especially since the recession (which I justifiably call the Second Great Depression) has fallen the hardest on the backs of the working poor and the middle classes.

I'm also concerned with the fact that so many of our products come from China and other overseas producers.  Unfortunately, this is not necessarily the fault of American producers but rather that of government intervention in the economy.

What I'm about to say to you might seem a little crazy, but I urge you to bear with me.

The Myth of Protecting American Industry
Buying American products alone will do nothing to restore our economy, nor will it bring production and jobs back to the country.  Instead, what this does is actually raise prices and diminish the quality of domestic products, since producers now know that they have American buyers captive and no longer need to make the best products; they know that the law is on their side.

When I say that I'm all for free market capitalism, it means that the market needs to be truly free and unrestrained in order for consumer sovereignty to take place.  By consumer sovereignty, I refer to the old notion that "the consumer is king" or "the customer is always right", and according to this ideology, producers who want to get rich know that the only HONEST way to do this is to produce the BEST QUALITY goods at the LOWEST COST and sell them at the lowest possible price.  This is how hard-working Americans have been getting rich for centuries.

Unfortunately, there are those who have found easy ways to get rich through the evils of government intervention.  I’ll explain this momentarily.

There have been periods in American history where there were high tariffs on imported goods (and some of these taxes still exist) which were meant to improve conditions for American businesses and consumers, but instead made things worse.  The free market is all about competition, and tariffs are essentially meant to kill competition.  Not only do tariffs on imports cause many American producers to lose their incentive to produce high quality goods at low prices (because without the competition they know they have their consumers by the throat), but often times foreign countries retaliate.  Because our high taxes make it harder for them to sell their countries’ products in America, they in turn set super high tariffs to punish American producers.  Therefore, the quality of goods produced at home goes down, the prices of those low-quality goods goes up, and the quality of foreign goods which are often good quality is now super high.

Interventionism
This happened during the Great Depression, and both the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations have blood on their hands.  Both administrations, among many other anti-free market crimes, dramatically raised tariffs on foreign goods under the myth that it would boost American industry.  They also set minimum wage laws that were meant to protect incomes.  Well, guess what the tariffs DIDN’T do for our economy and job creation, and guess how foreign countries reacted to them.  Regarding the minimum wage laws, they made production more expensive and unmaintainable for producers, so instead of only having some pay cuts, they ended up having to lay off workers or just went under completely, thus laying off all workers.  Furthermore, small and medium-sized employers were no longer able to afford to hire people because they couldn’t pay X dollars per hour.  Removing the regulations and interventionist measures that strangle industry will ultimately make it less expensive to create jobs in America, and jobs will migrate back from the third world.

Because of the government stepping in to be the hero, business growth is stunted, and that stunted growth also stunted job creation, and things are more expensive for everyone.  Many big businesses will send lobbyists to the federal government because most of this is EXACTLY what they want.  They want to be able to charge higher prices for cheaply produced goods, and they want no foreign competition, especially not from foreigners who are probably making things better and selling them cheaper.  The one thing these greedy businesses DON’T see is that, while they’ll make a profit from their captive consumers in the short run, everyone gets poor in the long run and these businesses fail and end up having to be bailed out by the federal government. This is not what the free market ever intended.

For more on the evils of regulation, you can check out Frederic Bastiat’s book The Law, which talks about how government intervention and regulation empowers the two main forms of plunder: stupid greed and false philanthropy.  The producers getting lazy on the quality of their products because people can only afford to buy American falls under stupid greed.  The regulations and minimum wage laws and “job creation” bills, “consumer protection” bills, etc., fall under false philanthropy.  You can also see chapter 18 of Jeffery Tucker’s book Bourbon For Breakfast (chapter titled “How Free is the Free Market?”).  I also HIGHLY recommend chapters 1 and 2 of Kel Kelly’s book The Case For Legalizing Capitalism, which fully explain the consequences of government intervention on stateside producers as well as international trade (and this book is a lot of fun to read and easy to understand).  All three books can be downloaded in full and for free at Mises.org/books.

Continued in part 2: Bailouts, the Federal Reserve, and the Contender

Thursday, July 21, 2011

No, We're Still Not Protected

By Zach Foster
Best read with companion article No, Your Money Isn't Safe

Many members of the Democratic Party are celebrating the one year anniversary of President Obama’s signing into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  The White House has sent out a video release outlining why the banks and Wall Street agents are bad and why the Dodd-Frank Act is good and American families and consumers are much better off.  While the video is somewhat informative and marginally interesting, much of it is either redundant or not quite true.  DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz is also waving the Party banner as she cheers on the President’s so-called accomplishments.[1]  Schultz bragged that “our economy is more protected from the threat of future economic crises.”

The truth is that, while there are a few more restrictions on what the clowns on Wall Street can do, Americans are not better off than they were a year ago before the magical everything-proof shield was signed into law.  Banking is still highly unstable in the country, and the banks still exist as entities only because they were artificially revived in the form of massive bailouts.  All across the political spectrum, Americans are angry that the massive bailouts ever happened, and they haven’t forgotten that this bailout, spearheaded by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner (who was present at the appointment ceremony for the head of the CFPB), happened under President Obama’s watch and he failed to take action against it. (Find out why banking is still highly unstable)


Schultz is attempting to pin poverty on the Republican Party, especially Republican members of Congress.  Much of her attack against the GOP is dismissible, as it’s just another serving of partisan rhetoric.  However, she accuses the GOP of “doubling down on the failed policies of less regulation and more tax breaks for the wealthy.”  She is mistaken to do so, because the policy of less regulation is not a failed one.  While several are undoubtedly opposed to the Obama administration’s agenda simply for the reason that they passionately hate the President, most are even-tempered people with some idea of what they’re doing.  By no means do Congressional Republicans advocate, nor are they trying to implement, no regulations at all.  What they are trying to do is remove some of the chains that cripple industry, such as tariffs, trade agreements that favor one country or company over another, and many of the other industry killers that remain unseen.[2]

Despite whatever noble intentions are spoken of by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the fact remains that American consumers are not protected.  They are only partially protected from a few unscrupulous consumer goods producers, but they remain exposed to the oppression of government regulation.  This is why it is nearly impossible for consumers to get their hands on raw milk, which when boiled is more nutritious than pasteurized milk,[3] though federal think tanks denounce it and federal regulations outlaw it in the interest of public health.  The same is why many shower heads have a weak water flow and high power therapeutic shower heads used by masseuses are widely outlawed.[4]  For the “protection” of all consumers, citizens are instructed to prevent drought by using less water, even though the local Raging Waters park, Soak City park, and even the community pool use untold gallons every minute.

Similar reasons over time turned the health insurance market into the fiasco it is today.  Heavy regulations by state governments are what makes the prices of health care plans vary widely and mostly unaffordable.[5]  The same regulations that make health care so expensive are all meant to protect consumers from being cheated by health insurance providers who want to charge high prices… go figure.

To further damn the idea that fewer regulations are beneficial to economic growth, Schultz tries to make the case that fewer regulations caused this [brink of] depression.  To counter this statement it is necessary to analyze the common denominators between the Great Depression and today’s Second Great Depression (a.k.a. the Great Recession).  The main two factors that stick out are: (1) fractional reserve banking, meaning most of the money that was supposed to exist never actually existed, and (2) extensive use of credit in making large transactions, which means banks, stock markets, and many other firms were buying and selling with promises to pay based on money that never existed.  In the daily lives of the American citizens, receiving something on credit and then not paying for it is called FRAUD.  This is not due to fewer regulations; this is clearly a case of people stealing and other people thinking they had more monopoly money to spend in the real world than they actually had.

So when the President, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the DNC Chair tell the American people that they are protected, who do they really think they’re fooling?


The image is artwork by the author.  It was compiled from various images on Wikimedia Commons.


[2] Bastiat, Frederic. That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen. Chapter 9: Credit.
[3] Thornton, Mark. “Legalize Milk, Real Milk”. http://mises.org/daily/5365/Legalize-Milk-Real-Milk
[4] Tucker, Jeffrey. “The Bureacrat In Your Shower” (also chapter 1 of Bourbon For Breakfast).
[5] “The Easy Fix For Health Care and Why Obama Opposes It.”
[1] Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz Marks One Year Anniversary of Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. http://political-spectrum.blogspot.com/2011/07/chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz-marks.html

Monday, July 18, 2011

Compromise Isn’t a Dirty Word

By David Plouffe

Back in March, I was in the room as President Obama spoke to a group of young Americans of different political persuasions in Massachusetts.  He spoke candidly and openly about the importance of compromise in our democracy — even from people who care passionately about their position.

Take a look:

One quote stuck with me: “the nature of our democracy and the nature of our politics is to marry principle to a political process that means you don't get 100% of what you want.”

This is a President who believes searching for common ground is the right way to approach solving our problems. And in fact, in the divided government our country has chosen, it’s the only way we can.

Unfortunately, that view isn’t shared by everyone in Washington, DC.  And you can see that right now as the President is trying to bring people together to tackle our debt and get our fiscal house in order.

This is a difficult process, and it means Republicans and Democrats need to step outside their political comfort zone and find some common ground — the President is willing to make tough cuts with real impacts, not easy decisions.

But most Congressional Republicans have dug in and demanded that the sacrifice fall only on the middle class, seniors and struggling Americans.

The President tried to make it easy for them by suggesting closing some of the most egregious loopholes for the very wealthiest Americans and special interests — so that hedge fund managers don’t pay lower taxes than firefighters and teachers, corporate jet owners don’t pay lower taxes than commercial airlines, and oil companies don’t get tax cuts at a time they are making record profits. 

Congressional Republicans have not yet given an inch even though the American people, regardless of which political party they belong to, overwhelmingly approve of this common sense, balanced approach.

Our nation is climbing out of the worst recession since the Great Depression, and one of the most important things we can do to help the economy is to get our fiscal house in order and reduce our Nation’s deficit.  We can’t let this moment pass us by.

Compromise isn’t a dirty word — in fact, it’s the only way our democracy can get big things done.

David Plouffe is a Senior Advisor to the President