Showing posts with label state of the union. Show all posts
Showing posts with label state of the union. Show all posts

Friday, February 3, 2012

A Blueprint for American-Made Energy

In his 2012 State of the Union Address, President Obama laid out a Blueprint for an America Built to Last, underscoring his commitment to an all-of-the-above approach that develops every available source of American energy. The President’s plan calls for the safe and responsible development of domestic oil and natural gas resources, support for a wide range of clean energy technologies, and new initiatives to increase the energy efficiency of the industrial sector to make American manufacturing more competitive. For more information about President’s plan, take a look at our fact sheet.
 
A few days after the State of the Union Address, the President took to the road to highlight how natural gas can play a larger role in our transportation sector. The President visited Las Vegas, Nevada to tour a UPS depot that hosts natural gas-powered trucks. The depot is less than a mile from a new natural gas refueling station in Las Vegas, which was developed jointly by the Department of Energy, South Coast Air Quality Management District, UPS, and Clean Energy Fuels.  The new refueling station will make it possible for trucks to drive from Long Beach to Salt Lake City, powered entirely by American natural gas.
 
The President also traveled to Buckley Air Force Base in Aurora, Colorado to talk about his “all-of-the above” energy strategy. The President underscored his commitment to clean energy and discussed the Administration’s plans to:  expand the development of renewable energy on public lands; push for a Clean Energy Standard: and work with the Department of Defense to purchase enough clean energy to power 250,000 homes a year. The President also emphasized the importance of improving energy efficiency by helping manufacturers and businesses upgrade their facilities, which could save the U.S. manufacturing sector $100 billion over the next decade.
These actions represent just a snapshot of the Administration’s efforts to promote clean energy.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Green Party: We Respond to the State of the Union, Social Networking​, and More!


Thank you for staying connected with the Green Party. Here is our monthly newsletter for February. 
 
Watch Our State of the Union Response
Last week the Green Party held a live streamed response to President Obama's State of the Union Address. Presidential contenders Jill Stein and Kent Mesplay were on hand to lay out their Green visions for the nation. You can check out those videos and other speeches, workshops, and interviews here at our Livestream channel.
 
Green Candidates Need You
The Green Party is running candidates for local, state, and federal offices in 2012. These candidates are working to promote Green values in your community and on school boards, city councils, in state legislatures and in Congress.
 
You can find candidates in your area with our online elections database. You can search by state to find out who is running in your area. As always, Green candidates do not accept contributions from corporations or political action committees (PACs), so your financial support and volunteer efforts are key to getting our candidates seen, heard, and elected.
 
Check out our elections database now. If you are running for office or thinking of running for office, and want to know how to get into our database, please let us know (office@gp.org).
 
Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, and Now Google+
You can stay connected with the Green Party and other Green Party supporters on Facebook or Twitter ( @GPUS ). Now you can join our circle on Google+. Make your support of the Green Party part of your social life by sharing Green news with your friends!

Source: e-letter from the Green Party

Friday, January 27, 2012

West Wing Week: Inside the 2012 State of the Union

This week, the President prepared for and delivered his State of the Union Address, welcomed the Boston Bruins to the White House, and took his message West to Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado.
 
Go behind the scenes of the President's week.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Shameless, Free Infomercials for Two Guilty Parties

Obama's State of the Union and the Republican Response
 
“Sponsors of even the most embarrassing, inane and fraudulent infomercials have to pay for their own air time. They can’t force TV stations to run their ads for free by threatening to shut them down.
 
“Through the Federal Communications Commission and other government coercion, Democratic and Republican politicians run their shameless infomercials on prime time TV free of charge. Tonight’s infomercial hand-outs were the State of the Union address and the ‘opposition’ response.
 
“But wait, there’s more!
 
“Unlike Ginsu knives, hair spray for men, and ripped abs in 30 days, the Republican and Democratic infomercials have no redeeming social value.
 
WASHINGTON, DC – Mark Hinkle, Chair of Libertarian Party, continues with:
 
“Honest taxpayers realize you can’t spend more money than you earn. They know that the #1 problem in America today is Government Overspending.
 
“The SOTU and Republican Response infomercials are a grand dog-and-pony show aimed at distracting attention from the fact that Democratic and Republican politicians are equally guilty of driving government spending into the stratosphere.
                                                                                                                                                             
•    “Both Democratic and Republican politicians initiated and supported bailouts.
•    “Both Democratic and Republican politicians initiated and supported mandates to buy medical insurance imposed on individuals and small businesses.
•    “Both Democratic and Republican politicians have voted for a laundry list of new and expanded government programs – keeping taxes high and driving our national debt to staggering sums that defy comprehension.
 
“President Barrack Obama blamed the administration of former President George W. Bush for driving up debt and high unemployment.
 
“In response, Republican Governor Mitch Daniels threw blame back on the president and on the Democrat-controlled Senate.
 
“Both are correct. Both Democratic and Republican politicians in Washington D.C. are responsible for causing today’s economic woes.
 
“Both Democratic and Republican politicians claim their policies ‘create jobs.’ But they do the opposite: they expand Big Government and thereby destroy private sector jobs. Democratic and Republican policies are crippling small businesses that create jobs.
 
“Democratic and Republicans politicians deliver the same policies:  High government spending, high taxes, burdensome regulations, endless foreign military intervention and violations of our personal liberty.
 
“Both Democratic and Republican politicians cater to Special Interest greed while dismissing the wants and needs of ordinary Americans.
 
“Today more voters than ever realize that Democratic and Republican politicians are players in the same game of Big Government. They differ only in the color of their red and blue jerseys.
 
“More voters than ever realize that Democratic and Republican politicians are equally responsible for destroying jobs, violating individual rights, and lowering the standard of living for Americans.
 
“The Libertarian Party offers voters a desperately-needed alternative. Since its founding 40 years ago, the Libertarian Party remains unwavering in its pursuit of liberty, free trade and small government.
 
“Whether Libertarians are running for U.S. House, the Senate or the White House, they reject the self-serving interests of Big Government Profiteers. Libertarians represent the silent majority of Americans who want a choice for much less government:

•    Huge and immediate reductions in taxes and government spending
•    Repeal of laws that violate individual freedom
•    An end to gunboat diplomacy and foreign political entanglements
•    Dismantling of government bureaucracies and red tape.
 
“Every vote cast for a Libertarian is a vote for much less government, personal freedom, and peace."
 
Libertarian Party Chair Mark Hinkle and Executive Director Carla Howell are available for interviews or comment on the State of the Union and the Republican response. Please contact the Libertarian Party headquarters at 202-333-0008 between 9:00am and 5:00pm to arrange an interview.
 
The Libertarian Party was founded in 1971. It is America’s largest third party.
 
For more information about the Libertarian Party, visit LP.org.

Jobs and 'The State of the Union'

The year 2012 will be pivotal in the fight for jobs and the direction our country takes on progressive ideas. Will the GOP, under the influence of the Tea Party, continue to chip away at our social safety net and workers rights? Not if we stand up and be heard - through our unions, community groups, Occupy, in the voting booth and wherever else we can. Even though job creation is better under Obama than it was under Bush, we still have a huge fight ahead of us. The good news is, the wind is at our backs and workers are getting active all around the country to make this a banner year!
 
A 'Jobs State of the Union' Speech
Tuesday night President Obama gave a State of the Union address that was a jobs speech. At the heart of his address were important concrete steps aimed at restoring jobs and opportunity. The  speech framed an industrial policy for our country. It outlined big steps towards revitalizing manufacturing and creating new  green energy and manufacturing sectors. The President keyed in on the need to repair  our crumbling infrastructure and build modern transportation and energy  systems, putting millions back to work. It included important educational and job training initiatives, including making college and advanced training more accessible for low and middle income students.
 
What the Unemployed are Currently Facing
Working people know that the Great Recession has devastated our country - all the while the 1% profit from it. Teens are seeing the highest unemployment rate since statistics have been kept. More than one in five veterans are coming back from wars overseas and not able to find work. And though we see signs of a recovery in several areas, it has not been helping the poor very much. Long-term unemployment has visited upon many millions of workers - so much so that a documentary series, “F__ked: The United States of Unemployment,” has been made about their plight.
 
Action for the Unemployed
Congress narrowly averted cutting off millions of Americans from unemployment insurance when it passed a stopgap two-month extension just before the holidays. But that extension is set to expire at the end of February, so millions of unemployed workers are again at risk of losing their federal unemployment insurance - unless Congress acts to fully renew the program through 2012.
 
In solidarity,
 
Scott Marshall
Labor Chair, CPUSA
 
Source: e-letter from CPUSA

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

VIDEO: Senator Rand Paul Responds to State of the Union

Sen. Paul Delivers State of the Union Response - Jan. 24, 2012
 
Sen. Rand Paul delivered the following Republican response to President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address this evening:


Source: Paul.senate.gov

Ron Paul Responds To Obama’s State Of The Union Speech

“Tonight, President Obama once again showed that he does not represent the fundamental change this country needs.”



LAKE JACKSON, Texas – See below for 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul’s response to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address.

“Tonight, President Obama once again showed that he does not represent the fundamental change this country needs. Instead of offering solutions to the problems our country faces, the President was intent on delivering a campaign speech, further dealing in the typical Washington political gamesmanship that has gotten us exactly nowhere close to improving the lives of the American people.

“In a speech where much of the rhetoric was devoted to job creation, it was strange that President Obama would brag about his job-destroying national health care plan, Obamacare, and the Dodd-Frank bill, which, contrary to the President’s claims, guarantees future taxpayer bailouts of large institutions. Unfortunately, President Obama’s ‘job creation’ policies amount to little more than continuing to allow government bureaucrats to pick winners and losers, which is a recipe for continued economic stagnation.

“President Obama claims to want an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. Yet he remains committed to the same old system of debt, deficits, bailouts, and cronyism that created our economic problems. The President speaks of giving us energy independence from unstable nations, yet he refuses to allow the type of development needed to achieve this goal, while at the same time his administration hands out favors to the politically connected – those given to the likes of Solyndra, who fail to produce jobs or energy but succeed in ripping off the taxpayers.

“Of course, President Obama refuses to even mention the role the Federal Reserve plays in creating an economic system where some are denied a fair shot or even to support my efforts at bringing transparency to the Federal Reserve. Also not mentioned by President Obama is the very crucial need for reining in spending and balancing the federal budget. What is called by some ‘the greatest threat to our national security’ seems not to be of great importance to this President, although I, like many Americans, believe it to be cause for immediate measures, like the $1 trillion in spending cuts that would take place in my first year as President under my Plan to Restore America.

“In the area of foreign policy and civil liberties, President Obama’s rhetoric may be different, but the substance of his polices – as shown by his administration’s defense of the TSA’s treatment of my son, Senator Rand Paul, is hardly ‘change we can believe in.’ No wonder more and more Americans, especially young people, are rejecting the phony alternatives of Obama and establishment Republicans and embracing my campaign to Restore America Now.”

Monday, January 23, 2012

What would you ask President Obama?

Tomorrow, President Obama will deliver his State of the Union address at 9:00 p.m. ET. During that speech, he’ll lay out his vision for an America where hard work and responsibility are rewarded, where everyone does their fair share, and where everyone is held accountable for what they do.
 
There is a range of ways to get involved with this year’s State of the Union address.
 
Immediately following the President’s speech on Tuesday, be sure to stay tuned to WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU for a live panel featuring senior White House advisors answering your questions about the speech. Then, on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, a group of policy experts and advisors to the President will sit down for Office Hours on Twitter -- discussing the issues that matter to you and your community.
 
Finally, on Monday, January 30, President Obama will join the conversation in a special Google+ Hangout, a live multi-person video chat, from the White House.
 
Participating in the Hangout is easy -- just visit the White House YouTube channel to submit your questions and vote for your favorites between now and January 28. A few participants will be chosen to join the President in the Google+ Hangout to ask their questions of the President live!
 
Check out WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU to learn more about watching the enhanced State of the Union online and all the ways you can ask questions this week.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Your Taxpayer Receipt

Good afternoon,

Have you ever wondered how much of your own tax dollars actually go to support foreign aid? To support education? Well, now you can find out – and you might be surprised.

In his State of the Union Address, President Obama promised that this year, for the first time, American taxpayers would be able to go online and see exactly how their federal tax dollars are spent.
So today, we’re announcing the first-ever federal taxpayer receipt. Check it out at WhiteHouse.gov.

Just enter a few pieces of information about your taxes, and the taxpayer receipt will give you a breakdown of how your tax dollars are spent on priorities like education, veteran’s benefits, or health care.

Sincerely,
David Plouffe
Senior Advisor to the President

P.S. In case you missed it, be sure to check out President Obama’s speech laying out his plan to reduce our deficit by $4 trillion over the next twelve years at WhiteHouse.gov/fiscal-framework.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Obama: Investing In Our Future

Good afternoon,

Just a few weeks ago, in my State of the Union Address, I spoke about how America can win the future by out-educating, out-innovating and out-building the rest of the world.  I also talked about taking responsibility for our Nation's deficits, because we can’t win the future if we pass on a mountain of debt to our children and grandchildren.

Yesterday, I sent my budget proposal for 2012 to Congress, and I wanted to take a moment to explain some of the tough choices we had to make so we can afford to invest in our future.

Like American families, the Federal Government must live within its means. That means eliminating wasteful spending and cutting programs that aren't working.  It also means that programs, like Community Development Block Grants, which I care about deeply, need to be scaled back to confront the crushing debt we face.

You can learn more about the budget proposal and watch Jack Lew, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, explain our approach here:

Getting our fiscal house in order requires shared sacrifice. But even in these tough times, we have a responsibility to make smart investments in our Nation's future.
That's why we must invest in innovation to ensure that the jobs and industries of the future are built right here in America.  It's why we need to invest in roads, bridges, high-speed rail and high-speed Internet to help our businesses ship their goods and ideas around the world.

And it's why America must invest in education so that all of our children have an opportunity to fulfill their potential. Even though parents are the key to a child's education, we have a responsibility to ensure that America's students are prepared to compete and thrive in the 21st century global economy.

Yesterday, I visited Parkville Middle School and Center of Technology near Baltimore, Maryland. At Parkville, students gain a strong background in math, science and critical thinking skills that they will need to compete for the jobs of the 21st century. In fact, the most popular subject in their magnet program is engineering.

Investing in schools like Parkville, investing in quality teachers, investing in higher education – these are down payments on our children's and our country's future.
Here are just a few investments in education that I've proposed in the budget I sent to Congress:

Preparing 100,000 new math, science and engineering teachers.
Expanding Race to the Top, a reform program that has led more than 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning for less than 1 percent of what we spend on education each year.
Helping more kids afford college by making the American Opportunity Tax Credit permanent and strengthening Pell Grants for 9 million students.

Here in Washington, we have to take a cue from millions of American families who have been tightening their belts while continuing to invest in their future.  And that's exactly what my budget proposal does – it puts us on a path to live within our means so we can invest in our future.

Sincerely,
President Barack Obama

Thursday, February 3, 2011

State of the Union: Restoration of Education, Part 3

By Zach Foster

This is one in a series of articles responding to issues discussed by the President in his 2011 State of the Union address.

View Part 1 or Part 2

Raising the standards and level of curriculum and re-educating the current teachers with a poor performance can only go so far in the great task of restoring classical education.  One area where credit is due to the President is in his declaration that the No Child Left Behind Act will be repealed.  This is a desperately necessary measure.  Many students have trouble at school and need tutoring, or maybe even some simple mentoring, given that many children of single parents lack a father or mother figure, and they will do fine.  Yet there are some who simply refuse to do what is expected of them at school.  In the era of No Child Left Behind, these do-nothings were allowed to graduate and go out into the real world, COMPLETELY unprepared.  Where are they now?  They have gotten nowhere.  Plainly and simply, some students need to be left behind.  They need to not be rewarded for failure.  They need the social stigma of NOT moving on with the rest of the herd so that the pure shame and horror may motivate them to change their situation.

The President said in State of the Union Address, “It is the responsibility of the family to instill the love of learning in a child.”  Never has this been more true.  The author of this article graduated from high school on the honor roll, and has attended college and is awaiting the opportunity to enter the university system.  Despite these years of education, beginning with pre-school and continuing with the university system, most of the author’s education did not come from school—rather, it came from independent study simply for the sake of learning.  The pursuit of knowledge has always been a passion of the author’s, which was instilled in him by his parents.  The one teacher that truly changed the author’s life was Jack Wood, professor of English and Advanced Rhetoric at Citrus College.  It was under Professor Wood that the author learned to write well (Professor Wood cites his own fortune in receiving a classical education).  The rest of the courses were fun, but they could easily have been done without.

Many parents in America were educated in the public school system or even the university system in the midst of their great decline.  Therefore, they have joined the ranks of the barely-skilled churned out graduates with generic degrees, like MBA, which they earned in three-or-so years of college, or after six or seven years at a community college topped off by one year of university.  Many parents today simply don’t have a love of learning, therefore their children most often don’t care to learn, but would rather spend their waking hours allowing their minds to be absorbed and sucked into a video game screen.  Combine this with the inability of many teachers to teach, and parents still wonder why their children are failing in school.

Parents must teach their children to love learning, and this most often starts with a trip to the library, or the installation of a quality encyclopedia on their home computer.  Does the child like muscle cars?  Then let the parents and the child spend quality time learning fun facts about muscle cars.  Does the child enjoy military topics or playing war games?  Let them visit Grandpa who was actually at the battle of Iwo Jima, so that his story may be passed on to a receptive mind.  Is the child interested in other countries?  Then let the parents and the child see up-close images of far off lands on Google Earth.  There is an amazing world out there to be discovered, but in order to learn about it, the child must be taught by the parents to seek out knowledge.

To some it may seem awfully utopian to expect that poor-quality teachers will be reeducated, that standards and curriculum will be raised to the same integrity of fifty years ago, and that parents will snap out of their hypnosis to teach their children a love of learning.  Perhaps it is utopian—a dream.  Nonetheless, if these things don’t come to pass, America’s youth will forever be slaves to mediocrity.

Winning the Future through Clean Energy Innovation

In his State of the Union Address, President Obama emphasized the importance of investing in clean energy innovation. The President introduced a number of ambitious, but achievable proposals that will transform America’s energy future through innovation including generating 80 percent of our energy from clean energy sources by 2035, putting one million advanced technology vehicles on the road by 2015, and investing over $8 billion in research, development and deployment of clean energy programs.

In case you missed it, be sure to check out the President State of the Union Address at WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU.

Over the past few weeks, agencies from around the Administration have been outlining the ways in which they are already helping to win the clean energy future.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

State of the Union: Restoration of Education, Part 2


By Zach Foster

This is one in a series of articles responding to issues discussed by the President in his 2011 State of the Union address.

Continued from Part 1

It has been well established that mediocrity prevails in American education.  Curriculum has been watered down and standards have been lowered in order to advance the radical social agendas of the 1960s and 1970s.  Professor Jack Wood tackles many controversial topics in his book The Voice of Reason, including philosophy, history, and English:

“What [the five paragraph essay] does to the writing skills of practicing college essayists is abominable.  Purveyors of this little Quasimodo or composition like to define it thusly: the beginning, the middle, and the end.  Ahhhh…. Genius…  Once upon a time, students in English departments studied classical arguments that were gathered from the works of classical rhetoric.  The fundamental model of the classical argument (i.e. rhetoric) is the Aristotelian argument—which has five rhetorical movements.  Hear it?  Five movements (not five paragraphs).”

What needs to be done, aside from education standards and grade-level curriculum being raised over a period of five to ten years (to restore the integrity of education without destroying the current generation of students who have been set up for failure), is the re-education or removal of many current teachers.  They need to be given the classical education they were robbed of when they were in school before they can be able to competently build the minds of society’s youth.  Why would one come to such a bold conclusion?  One would come to it after personally sitting through the farce of public education, being forced to choke on political correctness, doctored history, philosophy that has been politicized, and a comedy of errors such including the “five paragraph essay.”

If the Obama administration wishes to increase of funding of education, perhaps they could consider spearheading a worthwhile endeavor: Send the current teachers back to school to learn what they never got to learn and un-learn mediocrity.  Let this re-education be paid for by the government, rather than countless dollars being thrown away on school districts where it may or may not be well spent.  Bring the greats of yester-year out of retirement to teach them.  Many of the older teachers, those who went to college in the late 1950s and early 1960s (before education went to hell), possess a truly higher education that could be passed on to the current generation of students.  There are a great many retired middle and high school teachers and university professors, well-educated and respected individuals in their academic communities, who would love to come out of retirement for a few years, both for the purpose of re-educating the poorly-taught teachers and for filling their empty shoes, teaching today’s students.

Next: “It is the responsibility of the family to instill the love of learning in a child.”

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Constitution Party: Response to the President’s State of the Union Address

By Darrell Castle
Constitution Party Vice-Chairman

[Last week] President Obama delivered his State of the Union address, as he is required by the Constitution to do once each year. Although he covered many different areas, he concentrated on only three: the domestic economy, which includes what he called job creation, domestic policy topics such as education and energy, and foreign policy, which includes military and defense issues.

The President told us that the nation is doing well economically and is on its way to recovery from recession. Evidence of this recovery, according to the President, is the “booming stock market.”

My response is that it is utterly ridiculous to say that we are well into recovery because the stock market is booming. Tell that news to the 43 million plus who have to use food stamps to eat. Tell that to the 15 million plus unemployed people. That number would be much higher than 15 million if the government kept honest numbers and counted the people who are no longer looking for jobs. Tell that to the millions of underemployed who used to have good jobs in manufacturing with benefits and who now work in service-related jobs with no benefits.

The President said that we can’t live in the past with regard to our economy. For example, it used to take about 1000 jobs to operate a steel mill, but now it only takes 100, so we must adjust to that reality and innovate. What he didn’t say is that any jobs in steel are being performed in Korea and other countries and no amount of innovation will change that.

What then is the answer to our economic problems? First, do no more harm with bailouts. Stop all bailouts and recover any money previously committed to bailouts that has not already been spent. Withdraw from all so-called free trade agreements such as NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO, and GATT which have been largely responsible for the destruction of America’s manufacturing base. Remove the regulations and restrictions that prevent businesses from doing business in America and from hiring the people they need to make the things that people want to buy.

Finally, the economy cannot recover until the debt and deficit are resolved through de-leveraging of debt and control of spending.  Stop spending more than you take in. It is a simple concept that Americans understand but that apparently their politicians don’t. Once the debt and deficit are under control, the President should endeavor to drive a stake through the heart of the entire Federal Reserve system and return to a monetary system based on sound money principles. Stop the destruction of our currency immediately.

The President also told us that educationally we are doing well, but we can do better, so he launched a program called Race to the Top in all fifty states to replace No Child Left Behind. This is also total nonsense. The United States continues to lag behind other nations in math, science, and reading skills. Our system of education, controlled and paid for by the federal government, is a failure and should be scrapped and replaced with state and local control, with primary responsibility left to parents. There is no role for the federal government in education whatsoever.

The nation’s energy needs could be met largely by domestic production if we were to allow our own domestic sources of energy to be exploited by repeal of harmful laws that unnecessarily restrain production. Technology will now allow energy exploration and production with minimal damage to the environment.  This would prevent the US government from exploring for oil in the Middle East through military force and help foster a more peaceful world.

Finally, the President talked about “shaping” a better world through strengthening NATO and rebuilding our relationship with Russia. He stated that 100,000 of our troops have come home from Iraq with their heads held high. That is also complete nonsense. It’s not his job to shape the world, it’s his job to protect and defend the Constitution and the American people. Many of those 100,000 troops didn’t come home but went to Afghanistan instead. Thousands of others did come home but in boxes or in rehab hospitals.

What then is the foreign policy answer? Issue an order to General Patraeus and the other commanders to execute an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. Then order a military withdrawal from the other 100 nations around the world where we have over 700 foreign bases. That would save many lives, much money, and would create far fewer enemies than we are creating now.

We simply must stop acting as if we own the world or as if we are responsible for it. That would not be isolationism but instead a lack of military domination. The US would trade with all nations who were willing to trade with us. Creditor nations would probably appreciate our new monetary policy whereby they were paid with real instead of counterfeit money.

If the President were to dedicate himself to the ideas proposed in this response to his speech, we would be well on our way to the most dynamic period in American history.
Source: Constitution Party

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Your Weekly Address: Out-Innovating, Out-Educating, and Out-Building Our Competitors

The President discusses his visit to a company in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and how it exemplified his agenda for America to “win the future” spelled out in the State of the Union Address.

Watch the video at http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/01/29/weekly-address-out-innovating-out-educating-out-building-our-competitors?utm_source=012911&utm_medium=intro&utm_campaign=daily.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

State of the Union: The Revolution In Egypt


By Zach Foster

This is one in a series of articles responding to issues discussed by the President in his 2011 State of the Union address.

There is political turmoil in Egypt as the future of the Arab Republic is unknown.  People have been taking to the streets, protesting, even rioting, calling for an immediate end to the current twenty-nine year-old Presidency of Hosni Mubarak, as well as an end of the tenures of many members of the government.  This five-day old revolution has begun a critical point in which the people have rejected government authority and are demonstrating how they are no longer under its control.  Mubarak instituted martial law and a curfew which police and the army are actively failing to enforce as they take a semi-neutral stance in the matter.  Many government officials as well as members of the parliament have simply packed up and left the country.  It is clear that the Egyptian people are tired of the current regime and they simply want true democracy and self determination.  The popular uprising may turn the Arab Republic into a phoenix, as the regime is poised to fall while from its ashes the republic is ready to be reborn in democracy that comes about of the people, by the people, and for the people.

The world is watching the Egyptian people of the Arab Republic, especially in the United States.  Socialist and Communist parties and organizations are waving red flags, raising banners, and claiming solidarity with the working class of Egypt.  This is what Socialists and Communists do whenever there is a major change in the world: they shout solidarity, pledge moral support, and ride the coat tails of revolutions and secular political movements from the safety of their college campuses and video blogs.  Not since the days of the Abraham Lincoln brigade have American Reds had the courage to actually fight to oppose tyranny.  Yet here they are, having their political demonstrations, looking good for the newspapers and the cameras.  However, their bubble of delusion must be burst.  The uprising in Egypt is not a proletarian revolution, but rather a movement of all the Egyptian people, rich or poor, land-owning or not, who have felt betrayed or victimized by the abuses of the Mubarak regime.  The Egyptian people of all classes do not identify with Western leftist “intellectuals,” nor do they wish to.

On the right, American conservatives are watching the revolution and wondering what Barack Obama is going to do about it, waiting intently and hungrily to have something else with which to demonize his Presidency.  There is much talk of the Suez canal.  “Oh no!  Egypt controls the Suez canal!  What will this do to world peace?  What is Barack Obama going to do about this?!”  The answer is: nothing.  There is nothing the President can do, nor anything that he should do.  It is true that there are several hundred American troops there as part of the 1,500~ strong Multinational Force and Observers on the Sinai Peninsula.  They are not in danger.  The MFO’s mission is strictly to deter Egypt and Israel from going to war, nothing more.  The Constitution makes no provisions whatsoever for intervention in foreign affairs, and Congress takes no actions against peaceful movements.  The fate of the Arab Republic is up to the Egyptian people and no one else.  Let peace and democracy reign in Egypt and throughout the Middle East.

Friday, January 28, 2011

State of the Union: Restoration of Education, Part 1


By Zach Foster

This is one in a series of articles responding to issues discussed by the President in his 2011 State of the Union address.

One critical element the President mentioned that needs improvement is education.  He cited that half the jobs in America require higher education, yet one out of four American teens does continue with education past high school.  This is indeed a problem, and one that is attributed to multiple factors in today’s society.

The greatest contributing factor to the rate of college graduates (and the quality of education) water sliding down into oblivion is the hollowness of standards and curriculum.  Fifty years ago, the basic curriculum of most American high schools was entirely more worldly and sophisticated than it is today.  Students used to read Shakespeare in middle school and they would learn advanced algebra and read the ancient philosophers in high school.  One social critic named Tom R, a politically active Republican from Mariposa County and a good friend of the author’s, stated that “I saw the math and English homework my son was working on in his second year of college and I instantly recognized it.  It was the same material I’d mastered by my sophomore year in high school.”  This is a testimony to the severe dumbing down of curriculum in high schools and colleges alike.  Why would teachers and professors destroy the curriculum?  There are many causes to speculate.

Jack Wood, an English and Advanced Rhetoric teacher at Citrus College, writes about the travesty of today’s education in his book The Voice of Reason.  He elaborates on several absurdities:

“Second and third-rate colleges in America are now run like Soviet committees after the Revolution.  Everything that ruined education in America began in the sixties, when liberals replaced something that worked with something that sounded good.  As if they were the only people who ever thought of it, half-bright professors at colleges where it was easy to get a job changed the job description of professor from ‘teaching the basucs’ to ‘taking a more activist role in changing society.’”

“Once again, the time frame of reference is about the same: 30 years ago.  That’s when the serious, analytical study of literature for its own sake—as a treasure of knowledge and art, was mugged and taken over by charlatans with a sociological agenda—who use literature to advance their own personal causes.”

The author of this article was talking with his sister about her son (his nephew), and the major complaint regarded his history teacher: “She actually said to my face, ‘Oh, history’s not important.  We just teach the kids how to pass a test.’”

All these anecdotes are testimony of the watering down of academic curriculum in public schools.  They also testify that mediocrity not only prevails, but has become a standard in its own right.  The first step to restoring education in America is doing away with mediocrity (in both public and private schools).  Standards must be raised.  Unfortunately, because of massive deficiencies in education, standards will have to be raised slowly over a period of five to ten years in order to not destroy the students of this generation who have no control over the mediocrity forced into their brains.

Part 2: Turn the tables! Reeducate the teachers!

Thursday, January 27, 2011

State of the Union: Why Afghanistan? Part 2 of 2


By Zach Foster

This is the first in a series of responses to the many issues brought up in President Obama’s 2011 State of the Union address.

Continued from Part 1.

Osama Bin Laden has proven to be actively involved in leading both Al Qaeda and the Taliban to wage jihad against the West.  At this point in time, Al Qaeda is out of Afghanistan, but the Taliban remain, and they have fought and clawed for every inch of ground the Coalition has taken from them.  They are terrorists who continuously use violence and murder against civilians to bring about their warped vision of a radical fundamentalist Islamic utopia.

Many people say, “Al Qaeda is gone, and as long as the Taliban stays inside Afghanistan, what goes on in that country is none of our business.  We have no business in Afghanistan!”  This falsehood is the result of grievously misguided judgments.  First and foremost, there is a war on and the present situation applies to the old shop proverb “You break it, you buy it.”  The United States military decapitated the Taliban government and leadership, and it would be completely irresponsible to abandon the new fledgling democratic Afghan government, since Afghanistan’s history has shown that fledgling democracies are quickly preyed on by the wolves.

American presence and assistance has been requested by the people of Afghanistan who dared to live outside of Taliban totalitarianism.  What many don’t know about the country is that it has been in a continuous state of civil war since 1977.  Nearly sixty years of peace in Afghanistan were interrupted in 1977 when the Communist party took over in a coup, actively taking steps to remove freedom of religion from the Afghan people.  The Communist phase, which included ten years of Soviet intervention, lasted until 1992. From 1992 to 1996 was the most chaotic phase of civil war, most of the time being fought three ways by three or more factions, ending with the victory of the Taliban.  Then from 1996 to 2001 saw the resistance against the Taliban by the United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan (the Northern Alliance)—our allies against the Taliban—who wanted nothing but to live free of radical religious totalitarian violence.  For years the Northern Alliance begged the world for help.  This help was ironically delivered into their hands when Al Qaeda brought down the towers.

Since then, with American intervention and the precious investment of American blood, the veterans of the Northern Alliance who bravely fought for freedom are now the leaders and a large portion of the ranks of what we know today as the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police.  Even better, the people of Afghanistan are voting in their own elections and slowly practicing free market.  The U.S.’s current mission for Afghanistan is to help their government to grow strong enough to take over its own fighting and to eventually stabilize its own country.  This mission has been working in Iraq.  Regardless of how people felt about the morality of the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq, we broke it, so it was our responsibility to fix it.  Now the Iraqi army and police are fighting their own war against insurgents, which has greatly wound down.  The Iraq War has been long, but the end is in sight, and it will be worth it.

Will peace and stability happen quickly?  No.  After the end of the Korean War, there was still much violence on the Demilitarized Zone, but with American assistance, the South Koreans were able to build up their military and their economy.  It took nearly three decades for South Korea to become a pure democracy, but today it is a model country.  South Korea is democratic and an industrial and military powerhouse, because the United States protected it from the North.  In 1972 and 1973, Vietnamization was working in favor of the South Vietnamese, who were able to win military victories against the North Vietnamese, with some American air power assisting them, such as in the battle of An Loc.  The South Vietnamese stopped a major North Vietnamese offensive in 1972.  However, Americans lost faith in the war and Congress broke the defense treaty with South Vietnam, and the people of the South were left defenseless against the North, which violated peace agreements, rebuilt its army, and launched a once-and-for-all massive invasion.

It will be a long road, but we must not abandon the Afghan people in their time of need.  Three decades from now, Afghanistan and Iraq can be like South Korea.  It is our responsibility to protect the Afghan people from the wolves a little longer, so that Afghanistan does not become the Taliban’s prey like South Vietnam was for the north.

President Obama's YouTube Interview

Today at President Obama participated in a live interview to answer citizens' questions submitted on YouTube.

And throughout the day policy experts from the White House and around the Administration answered questions about the State of the Union. Check out the full line-up and tune in at www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2011/01/27/your-interview-president-2011.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

State of the Union: Why Afghanistan? Part 1 of 2


By Zach Foster

This is the first in a series of responses to the many issues brought up in President Obama’s 2011 State of the Union address.

The President praised our armed forces and the people of Afghanistan and Iraq’s hard work in bringing about greater success in the Middle East.  He credited the armed forces with raising up the Iraqi armed forces, enabling them to take over combat duties against insurgents.  He reminded the American people that this is also our goal for Afghanistan’s armed forces in the war against the Taliban.  Most of Congress applauded this praise of the American, Afghan, and Iraqi armed forces.  After all, what member of Congress would dare not show support for the troops?  Publicly, few or none.  Privately, many of them harbor massive doubts to the morality of the mission in Afghanistan and the likelihood of success.  What doubts these individuals harbor privately, many American citizens voice publicly.

Many ask the question, “Why Afghanistan?”  The immediate response should be “How could you have forgotten?”  After all, unlike the 2003 invasion of Iraq which was loosely at best linked with Al Qaeda, the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan was a direct response.  Most Americans can easily remember what happened in 2001 and mentioning it here would be redundant.  Nonetheless, in 2001, Al Qaeda was very actively involved in operating jihad from within Afghanistan’s borders as well as influencing many of the country’s affairs.

Many would say, “Al Qaeda no longer has a presence in Afghanistan.  We shouldn’t be there anymore!  What does Al Qaeda have to do with the Taliban?”  The answer is: everything.  The Taliban was originally a fraternal organization to Al Qaeda, which openly allowed Al Qaeda to wage jihad from within Afghan borders, as well as occasionally aiding them.  The Taliban represent radical fundamentalist jihadist terror in Afghanistan.  Al Qaeda represents radical fundamentalist jihadist terror throughout the world.  Al Qaeda may be out of Afghanistan, but the Taliban remains a force to be reckoned with.  Furthermore, the two organizations share leadership.  The founder and number one leader of Al Qaeda is Osama Bin Laden, who is also the number two leader of the Taliban.

How did he become a man of two hats?  First, he attained a high position of leadership in the Mujahideen during the Soviet War.  He eventually returned to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, after the three-way phase of the Afghan civil war, to guide Al Qaeda and the Taliban in waging jihad against the West.  He praised the Taliban’s Afghanistan as “the only true Muslim country in the world.”  Then the towers and the Pentagon were attacked.

Part 2: propping Afghanistan and Iraq to be the Middle East’s South Korea, NOT the next South Vietnam