Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts

Monday, April 30, 2012

Reader submission: War or Peace?


By Meagan Sharp

Is Iran in 2012 another Iraq like 2003?

First of all, the biggest danger for our country right now is that a president is going to overreact and we are going to end up bombing Iran. If we can live through the cold war, which we did, with 30,000 missiles pointed at us then we should sit back and think and not assume that we are going to be attacked! Look what happened with Libya! ISRAEL has 300 nuclear weapons so why are we making them out to be some poor defenseless nation? We have 45 bases in IRAN (not including submarines)! IRAN can’t even produce enough gasoline for themselves and we're worried about them obtaining ONE weapon? Politicians are building this war up just like they did Iraq. We do not need to get involved in another war people!

As if that crisis wasn’t bad enough, President Obama has made it very clear that he will not only ignore the US Constitution, but will refuse to listen to congress when they don't let him have his way. Obama ignores the US Constitution and Congress when it suits his purposes. He issues edicts without regard to the US Constitution and signs into law unconstitutional acts. He is blatantly inconsistent, and he continues to get your support???

Oh, and for those of you who think he’s saving the economy and lowering unemployment: Our national debt has actually increased since Bush was in office, to be specific, the Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency and has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office. As for unemployment, North Carolina has lost nearly 50,000 jobs since President Obama took office and the unemployment rate is 9.9 percent. In Charlotte, unemployment is even higher, 10 percent. In total, 450,000 North Carolinians are unemployed, up 13 percent since Obama took office and these are just TWO examples.

HOWEVER, just because I am completely against Obama being reelected I want to make it clear that I am just as adamant about Romney NOT being elected either. What Republicans don’t seem to understand is that if Ron Paul is NOT on the ballot, none of his supporters are going to vote for Romney. Ron Paul is the only politician that has a chance of beating Obama. If you vote for Romney and don’t vote for Ron Paul then you can blame yourselves for Obama’s reelection and be prepared for a socialist society.

SO PLEASE, vote for peace, not war; for restraint, not excess; and for civil liberties, not authoritarianism.

RON PAUL 2012.



Feel free to share this page with everyone you know!
Reader submissions are always welcome. Send yours to PoliticalSpectrumPublishing@gmail.com.

Image is the property of MAD Magazine, not the article author neither the editor.  It is used here via Fair Use.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Ron Paul Raps Overseas Spending, Boondoggles

Insists billion dollar Baghdad embassy not national defense, reports Revolution PAC



NORTHBROOK, IL – January 17, 2012 – U.S. Rep. Ron Paul stood by his pro-America foreign policy Monday, insisting that the United States would experience greater national security with less overseas spending, notes Revolution PAC. Rep. Paul made his comments at the Fox News/Wall Street Journal Debate in South Carolina in response to a question regarding how his economic plan would impact the Palmetto State’s significant military workforce.

“Spending a billion dollars on an embassy in Baghdad bigger than the Vatican, you consider that defense spending. I consider that waste,” insisted Paul, to hearty audience applause.

“We have to have a strong national defense,” Paul continued, “but we don’t get strength by diluting ourselves with 900 bases in 130 countries … I’d probably have more bases at home.”

Paul’s “Plan to Restore America” would cut all foreign aid, end foreign wars, bring American troops home and cap defense spending at 1 percent growth annually.

“Just one presidential candidate is taking a critical look at military expenditures,” explains Revolution PAC Chair Gary Franchi. “True fiscal conservatives increasingly recognize the wisdom in more responsibly allocating our human and financial resources and are rallying to Ron Paul’s side.”

Rep. Paul, who is currently polling at 20 percent in South Carolina, received the coveted endorsement of South Carolina State Sen. Tom Davis Sunday, Davis calling Paul “a Tea Party of one against a towering wave of red ink.”

At a Myrtle Beach press conference Sunday, Davis added, “There’s only one person speaking to what I believe is the core problem of our country today. The biggest threat to our liberty comes from debt.”

Joining Davis, three additional South Carolina state senators – Sen. Lee Bright (Spartanburg), Sen. Kevin Bryant (Spartanburg) and Sen. Danny Verdin (Greenville) – endorsed Rep. Paul Tuesday.

Reinforcing what is shaping up as a two-man race, Paul and Romney are the only Republican candidates who have successfully secured positions on the primary ballots of every state, reported South Carolina’s The State newspaper last week.  A CNN/ORC International Poll released Monday also revealed that Paul and Romney are the only Republican contenders tied with Barack Obama in a likely general election matchup.

Revolution PAC is supporting U.S. Rep. Ron Paul’s campaign for the Republican nomination and consistent, constitutional message with targeted TV advertising, direct mail campaigns and innovative Web promotions complemented by billboards and radio ads in key primary states. Unlimited donations by individuals, businesses and organizations are being accepted by Revolution PAC to support that effort.

Source: Revolution PAC

Friday, December 23, 2011

Bombings in Iraq

Statement by the White House Press Secretary on Iraq
 
We strongly condemn the terrorist attacks against innocent Iraqis, which serve no agenda other than murder and hatred.  We offer our condolences to those whose loved ones were lost or wounded.  Attempts such as this to derail Iraq’s continued progress will fail.  Iraq has suffered heinous attacks like this in the past, and its security forces have shown they are up to the task of responding and maintaining stability.  Time and again, the Iraqi people have shown their resilience in overcoming efforts to divide them.  We continue to urge leaders to come together to face common challenges.
 
Vice President Biden has spoken to several senior Iraqi leaders over the past week. Today he called Iraqi President Jalal Talabani to offer our full support for his efforts, and those of other Iraqi leaders, to foster dialogue that will allow all Iraqi blocs to work through their differences together. The Vice President also reiterated the need for actions to be guided by the rule of law and Iraq’s Constitution. At this difficult time, the United States stands with Iraq as a strategic partner and a close friend.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

VIDEO: A Final March Toward Home

With America's war in Iraq coming to an end, the President welcomed Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki to the White House and invited him to a wreath laying ceremony, then spoke to troops at Fort Bragg on ending the war responsibly and standing by those who fought for it. After nearly nine years of sacrifice, the tide of war is receding, and the troops are coming home.
 
Watch the Video.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

The final march out of Iraq

Good afternoon,
 
After nearly nine years, our war in Iraq is ending.
 
In recent days, many of our troops have come home and been reunited with their families for the holidays. Over the next few days, a small group of American soldiers will begin the final march out of Iraq.
 
This moment of success is because of their sacrifice. More than 1.5 million Americans have served in Iraq. More than 30,000 of these brave men and women were wounded. Nearly 4,500 gave their lives. America’s military families have borne a heavy burden.
 
As we mark the end of this war, we need to show our veterans and their families that they have the thanks of a grateful nation.
 
Take a minute to look back at the moments that brought us to this point, then share a personal message of gratitude with those who have served.
 
Part of ending a war responsibly is standing by those who have fought it. It's not enough to honor our heroes with words; we must do so with deeds.
 
That's why we've worked to send 600,000 veterans and family members back to school on the Post-9/11 GI Bill. That's why one of Michelle's top priorities as First Lady has been to support military families and why she's worked with the private sector to get commitments to create 100,000 jobs for those who've served and their spouses. That's why we worked with Congress to pass a tax credit so that companies have an incentive to hire vets and have taken steps to help veterans translate military experience to the private sector job market.
 
In America, our commitment to those who fight for our freedom and our ideals doesn't end when our troops take off the uniform.
 
You can be a part of this effort to honor our heroes.
 
Help mark this moment. Write a quick note that troops and veterans all over the world will be able to see: http://www.whitehouse.gov/iraq
 
Thank you,
 
President Barack Obama

Friday, December 2, 2011

Sen. Paul Statement on Defeat of Detainee Amendment

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Yesterday nnight, Sen. Rand Paul prevented the passage of an amendment that would have further eroded Americans' constitutional rights. Offered to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 2012 (S.1867), amendment No. 1274 would have allowed the U.S. government to detain an American citizen indefinitely, even after they had been tried and found not guilty, until Congress declares an end to the war on terror.
 
"Suspicion of committing a crime should lead to your attempted prosecution. If the evidence does not support conviction, it would be against everything we believe in and fight for in America to still allow the government to imprison you at their whim," Sen. Paul said. "Tonight, a blow was struck to fight back against those who would take our liberty."
 
The amendment would have passed by voice vote, but this tactic was blocked by Sen. Paul's objection. He then forced a roll call vote, in which the amendment was defeated, 41-59.
 
Sen. Paul earlier this week introduced an amendment to formally end the war in Iraq. Despite the fact that troops will be removed from Iraq at the end of this year, the amendment failed 30-67.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Congresswoman Waters Applauds the Leadership of President Obama, Welcomes End to Iraq War

WASHINGTON - Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), founder of the Out of Iraq Caucus, issued the following statement in response to President Obama’s announcement that all U.S. troops will be removed from Iraq by the end of this year:
 
“As founder of the Out of Iraq Caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives, I salute President Obama for fulfilling his commitment to responsibly end the war in Iraq.  Today’s announcement that all remaining U.S. troops will return from Iraq by the end of 2011 is a welcome development that will surely warm the hearts of many families this holiday season.
 
When I joined with Reps. Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) and other members of Congress to organize the Out of Iraq Caucus, we were concerned that the reasons for the U.S. to engage in war in Iraq were not based on sound intelligence and further, that the war would place members of our armed forces at great risk while also depleting resources needed for our nation's domestic agenda. After nearly $1 trillion spent and more than 4,000 American lives lost, the costs to our country have been great.
 
As the war in Iraq draws to a close, it is my hope that this conflict will serve as a solemn reminder of the costs of war.  We must carefully reexamine our approach to national security and how we view the United States’ role in promoting international peace and security.  If we are to remain leaders in the world, we must always use our best judgment to determine when and how we engage other nations and other actors – particularly if we are considering the use of military force. 
 
While we are always prepared to meet the challenges of keeping our nation safe and secure, we must value the lives of our young men and women in uniform who bear the brunt of the responsibility for our decisions. To that end, I commend the President for his leadership in ensuring the responsible draw down of troops and eventual end to the U.S. war in Iraq.
 
My thoughts and prayers remain with the families of the more than 4,478 brave men and women who lost their lives in the eight years we occupied Iraq. I believe their legacy and heroism will live on in history and with the servicemembers who fought alongside them.”

Friday, September 30, 2011

Improved Iraq Enjoys Liberty, U.S. Commander Says

By Karen Parrish
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Sept. 29, 2011 – American forces’ efforts in Iraq “have given the people of Iraq a huge gift” through the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of a democratic society, a senior U.S. commander said today.

“We have given them freedom and liberty that they've never known, and we have given them the potential to have a democracy in this part of the world … where it would be a unique institution,” Army Maj. Gen. David G. Perkins, commander of U.S. Division-North and the U.S. Army’s 4th Infantry Division, told Pentagon reporters via video teleconference from his headquarters in Tikrit.

U.S. military forces are slated to depart Iraq by the end of the year. Iraq has experienced significant improvements, although some problems remain to be solved, the general said.

Operation Iraqi Freedom, launched in March 2003, ended the regime of the ruthless Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Iraqi Freedom transitioned to Operation New Dawn in September 2010, marking the shift from combat operations to training, equipping and assisting Iraqi forces. Perkins’ division has led those efforts in the northern provinces of Nineveh, Kirkuk and Diyala since last October.

The 4th was involved in the first troop rotation to Iraq and is now completing its fourth deployment, the general said, adding that every tour there has had unique aspects.

The advise, train and assist mission also has involved transitioning operations, operating areas and bases to Iraqi forces, Perkins said.

Those forces, he noted, now lead their own internal security operations and are focusing much of their training on the military’s traditional mission of defending against external threats.

Iraqi and Kurdish forces now share bilateral responsibility for 22 formerly trilateral checkpoints along disputed territory in northern Iraq, Perkins said, as U.S. forces have pulled back into an overwatch role.

No violence has occurred at any of those checkpoints since U.S. forces withdrew from daily presence, the general said, noting arbitration mechanisms are in place to manage any disputes, the general said.

“At the very senior level of this mechanism, we will have State Department people engaged as well as Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq people engaged, but it's at a much lower level as far as number of people than we had when I first got here,” Perkins said.

Iraqi forces also take the lead against al-Qaida activity in the north, which has long been a main operating and fund-raising area for the group as well as a primary entry point into the region for foreign fighters, he said.

“We've seen a dramatic drop-off in the foreign fighter flow coming into Iraq … [and] instead of foreign aid coming in large amounts, they're resorting to what I would call extortion, black marketing, robbery of jewelry stores, things like that,” Perkins said.

“We are now seeing intra-al-Qaida fighting and disputes [in] the organization itself about how money is distributed,” he added.

Perkins credited al-Qaida’s decline in Iraq to the capabilities and persistence of the country’s soldiers and police.

“They generally are on the pointy end of the spear here going after these folks,” Perkins said of the antiterrorism efforts conducted by Iraq’s security forces “And then when they do that, they are getting much better at getting their own internal intelligence, turning it around and going after the networks.”

The al-Qaida network in northern Iraq is not ineffective, but it has been “highly degraded,” the general said.

“We see now more vehicle-borne explosive devices that are parked and detonated versus being driven and detonated, which means they're having a hard time getting people who are true believers to actually be the suicide folks,” he said.

Perkins said Iranian-backed attacks in the north also have declined recently under pressure from Iraqi security forces.

“But, again, we know that capacity is there, so we keep those pressures on those networks,” he said, adding that historically, most Iranian-backed attacks happen in Baghdad and the southern part of Iraq.

Iraqi forces must be self-sustainable to maintain pressure on criminal and terrorist networks without U.S. military support, Perkins noted.

“From day one, our intent was to build a sustainable capability that on the last day, we can walk away, and then the day after that, it continues,” he said.

In training Iraqi forces, his troops are now focused on the areas of intelligence fusion and logistics, he added.

“We've paid additional attention to developing a logistics system, a supply system and also an ability for them to share intelligence not only within their army but between their police and border organizations … because, again, fusing that intelligence allows them to get after threats both internal and external,” the general said.

Perkins said his troops have spent much time putting together doctrinal and instructional manuals and getting them translated to Arabic.

“After we leave, again, there is something that they can build on,” he said. “We also videotaped and recorded … infantry movements, all the basic kind of things so they can take a very immature force, recruits, show them what right looks like and then move forward on it.”

Iraq’s defense capability will increase with its recently announced purchase of 18 F-16 fighters, the general said.

“I think the significant part is that they have made that commitment to get 18 [fighters] initially, which means they are now going to have a modern air force,” Perkins said. “They're going to have pilot training; they're going to have to have a maintenance program … and then adding aircraft after that is much easier.”

That sort of capability-building already has taken place in the Iraqi intelligence-gathering community, Perkins said.

“They weren't asking for their own [intelligence and surveillance] platforms because they didn't even know they had them,” he said. “And so once we told them that they had them, once we showed them how to ask for them, then that became self-sustaining because they generated a demand signal which then had to be met by their institution.”

Over the past year U.S. forces in northern Iraq have decreased from around 10,000 in 38 bases to about 5,000 in 14 locations, Perkins said.

“We have tried to do it in a very deliberate manner, in going over in a very deliberate way how they are going to conduct security,” he said.

“We've been very pleased, I think, with their ability to stand up and not only control the base and equipment, but keep security under control here in the north,” he said.

The United States has invested “a lot of treasure, both human and financial” in Iraq, the general said.

“Each day we hand more and more of the responsibility off to the Iraqis … [and] they are grabbing hold of and running with it,” he said.

Iraq’s leaders will determine how successful their country will ultimately be, Perkins said.

“It is up to the [Iraqi] political leadership to make this thing work and do the kind of tough work, selfless service, to make those hard decisions that are for the benefit of their country to make sure that this is a viable democracy,” he said.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Release of Hikers from Iran

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
September 21, 2011

I join President Obama in welcoming the decision made by Iranian authorities to release Shane Bauer and Joshua Fattal from detention. After more than two years, they will finally be reunited with their friends and families.

I am grateful for the efforts of all those who have worked for their release, in particular the Swiss Protecting Power in Tehran, the Omani government, the Iraqi government, and the many other world leaders who have raised their voices in support, as well as those inside Iran who pushed for justice.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The Green Party urges US/NATO to withdraw from Libya and support African Union efforts to broker a resolution

WASHINGTON, DC -- Green Party leaders urged an immediate US/NATO withdrawal from Libya after the advance of rebel forces into Tripoli, and called on President Obama to support a political solution to the crisis in Libya through diplomacy, with the involvement of the African Union, Arab League, and United Nations.

"The African Union's mediation committee offered a positive outline for an immediate ceasefire, followed by negotiation without preconditions and democratic elections in Libya. This is the perfect moment for President Obama, NATO, and the UN to support the efforts of the African Union to broker a resolution. All elements of Libyan society must be invited to the table to determine the country's new direction. The Libyan people must be allowed to decide their own future," said Romi Elnagar, member of the Green Party of Louisiana and the Green Party's International Committee (http://www.gp.org/committees/intl).

"If US and NATO forces prolong military action and attempt an occupation to stabilize Libya, the result will be more civilian lives lost and a disaster similar to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and the evaporation of hopes for freedom and democratic self-determination for the Libyan people," Ms. Elnagar added.

See "African Union Statement on the NATO Invasion of Libya: It's Time to End the Bombing and Find a Political Solution in Libya" by Dr Ruhakana Rugunda, Uganda's Permanent Representative to the UN, New Vision (Uganda), June 17, 2011 (http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/12/757904). According to the statement, "Gadaffi accepted dialogue when the AU mediation Committee visited Tripoli on April 10, 2011. Any war activities after that have been provocation for Africa. It is an unnecessary war."

The Green Party opposed the US/NATO assault on Libya from the beginning (http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=399) and Greens have strongly criticized President Obama for public statements, after the beginning of the attack, in which he changed the goal from "humanitarian intervention" for the protection of Libyan civilians to ousting Gaddafi. Attacking a country to remove its leadership is a violation of international law. The Libyan war was also conducted without congressional approval, even after the US House in June voted against authorizing continued military operations in Libya for one year.

The Green Party supports nonviolent resistance to oppression, as most Palestinians have practiced for decades and Egyptians more recently, and deplores the killing of unarmed civilians.

"The severity of bombing raids over the past few months suggests that Gaddafi himself has been and may still be the target. The bombing inevitably turned indiscriminate and led to widespread civilian death and injury. NATO's claim of protecting civilian lives has become increasingly implausible. Unfortunately, Secretary of State Clinton's refusal to grant the Libyan UN ambassador a visa has censored Libya's own collected statistics on civilian casualties resulting from the raids," said Farheen Hakeem, co-chair of the Green Party of the United States.

Cynthia McKinney, the Green Party's 2008 presidential nominee, recently conducted a fact-finding tour of Libya and reported on NATO's bombing of civilians at Al Fateh University, Campus B, in Tripoli on June 9 in her blog at Black Agenda Report (http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/more-nato-humanitarian-interventionthe-bombing-al-fateh-university-campus-b).

Green Party leaders noted that, while attacking Libya in the name of democracy and liberation, the US has withheld criticism of violent repression of popular movements for democracy in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel, which are US allies.

Greens have agreed with the call by the United National Antiwar Committee "for an immediate halt to US intervention in regions and countries where mass mobilizations are challenging oppressive regimes" (Statement on Libya, http://nepajac.org/libya.htm) and warned against US efforts to co-opt movements for democracy in African countries and force them to accept Africom (United States Africa Command), a program to impose US military presence and strategic objectives in African countries.

"The unprovoked assault on Libya has constituted a third war, with US troops still occupying Iraq and Afghanistan/Pakistan, against the government of a majority Muslim nation. It has opened a dangerous new front in a wider unending US war that is at least in part motivated by a desire to control the planet's largest oil reserves in the coming decades. These policies, unless reversed, may eventually ignite a global conflict in this century of dwindling oil resources and advancing climate change. Already, the US has spent $3.7 trillion on wars during the past decade, draining sorely needed funds from public services and other domestic necessities and aggravating the current fiscal crisis. It's time to retire the Bush-Cheney-Obama policy of military aggression," said Muhammed Malik, co-chair of the Miami-Dade Green Party (http://www.miamidadegreenparty.org) and a member of the Green Party's International Committee.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Church Bombing in Kirkuk, Iraq

Mark C. Toner

We deplore the attack today outside the Holy Family Church in Kirkuk and extend our condolences to the victims’ families and loved ones. Attacks like this, which target religious minorities, demonstrate the extent to which certain terrorist groups will go to disrupt the progress Iraq has made toward reducing violence.

We are confident the Government of Iraq will take all necessary steps to bring the people responsible for this horrific act to justice and continue its efforts to improve the security situation for all Iraqis, including those whose communities are threatened on the basis of their faith and beliefs.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

The President’s Speech on the Afghanistan War Troop Withdrawal

By Zach Foster

The President’s announcement last night over live television of the gradual withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan has been met with mixed reception and responses.  Conservative Democrats are praising the plan, while staunch anti-war Democrats and Libertarians are opposed to the war entirely, and Republicans are being predictable by criticizing the President’s withdrawal plan for being too modest/too quick/too weak/too hot/too cold, etc.  The plan itself emphasizes continuing to train and strengthen the Afghan National Army and police forces while ten thousand troops are withdrawn by the end of 2011, and a total of thirty-three thousand troops withdrawn by the summer of 2012.

It is apparent that this is a bold campaign move, as the President faces another election in the Fall of 2012 and he looks to preserve his image as the peace candidate.  This is a falsehood, since the only candidate whose actions (and Congressional voting record) consistently agree with his anti-war rhetoric is Ron Paul.  Let it not be forgotten that while campaigning in 2007-08, then-Senator Obama made all kinds of wonderful promises about bringing a swift end to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.[1]  While he did make good on his promise to withdraw combat troops from Iraq within sixteen months of his taking office (for which he deserves credit), it must be understood that there is a huge difference between ending a war and finishing or winning a war.

Also, let it be understood that in not completely following his campaign promises the President is NOT a liar.  This is an example of an idealistic young Senator making promises based on a narrow view of the way things are and how they ought to be, and how those views sharply changed after being sworn in and exposed to all the classified information exposing the grim reality.  Though “combat troops” have been withdrawn from Iraq, there are still approximately 50,000 troops there as “advisors” to the Iraqi security forces, and American troops continue to die in combat.  Thankfully, the number of Iraq War fatalities during Operation New Dawn are very few and government influence and stability within the country are very high compared to the hard dark times during the rise of the insurgencies in 2004 and the troop surge of 2007-08.  There has been true progress in Iraq.

This is why the author was pleased when the President announced the Afghan War troop surge in December of 2009.  The author understood that because of the massive distractions caused by the Iraq War, the Taliban was able to regroup and reassemble itself into a stronger force to re-challenge the fledgling Afghan government and Afghan War Coalition.  In this comeback the Taliban was aided by the presence of smaller jihadist movements like the Haqqani terror network and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.

Many Afghan War veterans can attest today that the Afghan security forces are getting stronger and can realistically be prepared to maintain stability by the end of 2014.  Apart from the constant battlefield victories of the Afghan War Coalition, Osama Bin Laden is dead along with more than half of Al Qaeda’s senior leadership.  For these victories, the gradual withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan is permissible.[2]  Much like there is hope for Iraq, there is hope for Afghanistan.

Concluded in Part 2: We did this before... AND WE SUCCEEDED.


[1] Shanker, Thom. Campaign Promises on Ending the War in Iraq Now Muted by Reality. New York Times. December 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/us/politics/04military.html
[2] Al-Qaeda so weak that US Afghanistan withdrawal would be justified. The Telegraph. June 2011. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/al-qaeda/8584898/Al-Qaeda-so-weak-that-US-Afghanistan-withdrawal-would-be-justified.html

Iraq: Terrorist Attack on American Convoy in Baghdad

Victoria Nuland
Department Spokesperson, Office of the Spokesperson
Washington, DC

The United States condemns a terrorist attack in Baghdad today that claimed the life of international development and finance expert Dr. Stephen Everhart and wounded three others. Dr. Everhart was an American citizen who was working in Iraq for an implementing partner of the United States Agency for International Development’s Mission in Iraq. He was killed while working on a project to introduce a new business curriculum to a Baghdad university in a program supported by the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education. His support of efforts to advance a modern and efficient financial sector has benefited the people and business enterprises of Iraq and his lifelong dedication to public service has improved the lives of countless people around the world.

We are saddened by this tragedy and extend our thoughts and prayers to Dr. Everhart’s family and loved ones, and to the three other injured victims and their families.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Secretary Clinton Calls Iraqi Foreign Minister

Secretary Clinton called Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari today to express support for Iraq’s continued re-integration into the region, highlighting Iraq’s hosting of the Arab League Summit in March. In addition, the Secretary and the Foreign Minister discussed a number of bilateral issues of mutual concern, including their shared desire to move the U.S.-Iraqi partnership forward as laid out in the Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA).

Friday, December 31, 2010

Iraq: Violence Against Christians

Mark C. Toner
Acting Department Spokesman
Washington, DC
December 31, 2010

We condemn the violence against Christians carried out overnight by terrorists in Iraq. President Talabani, Prime Minister Maliki, and virtually every political bloc and major religious leader in Iraq have denounced attacks on Christians and stressed the centrality of Christians in the fabric of Iraqi society. We commend the Government of Iraq for increasing its security measures to protect Christian communities since the October 31 suicide bombing attack at Our Lady of Salvation Church.

We call on the Government of Iraq to redouble its efforts to protect Christians and apprehend the terrorists who are behind these acts.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Why Wikileaks is a threat to International Security and Julian Assange is a traitor, Part 3

By Zach Foster
Click to view Part 1 or Part 2

Now that it has been established that Assange is a traitor to his country and an aide to terrorists, it is only fair to credit the successes of Wikileaks which have benefited the world.  There are indeed a great many bad things that need to be exposed, whose exposition not only benefits the world but also tends to bring attention to laws instead of violating them.  Assange, through Wikileaks, exposed the numerous extrajudicial assassinations taking place in Kenya, saying "It is a reflection of the courage and strength of Kenyan civil society that this injustice was documented. Through the tremendous work of organisations such as the Oscar foundation, the KNHCR, Mars Group Kenya and others we had the primary support we needed to expose these murders to the world."  The exposition of the Kenyan murders shows how laws were being broken and human rights were being violated left and right.  This is completely unlike the situation in the Iraq and Afghanistan war zones, which are under martial law and whose governments are engaged in armed combat against terrorist organizations that make an official policy of brutal torture and mass executions.  Furthermore, despite the seeming unethicality nature of water boarding or using fire hoses on detainees during interrogation, these actions are being carried out against unlawful combatants who have no protection whatsoever by the Geneva Convention.  It is almost humorous to look back on the capture of terrorists running houses of torture, where innocent civilians (alleged prisoners of “holy war”) had their fingers cut off, jaws ripped off, and then were executed by decapitation on film, and these terrorists had the nerve to demand their rights according to the Geneva Convention!

Assange’s exposing of secret documents of the Church of Scientology that show the “church’s” habits of preying upon the finances of its members, requiring certain fees amounting to thousands of dollars as a prerequisite for advancement in the church.  That was something that potential church members (and even un-knowing current ones) need to be made aware of.  Often times, hypocrisy by governments and politicians has been exposed.  If a member of a government is passing anti-drug legislation, or other legislation that takes a key moral side, and then engaging in contrary behavior in private, then a situation has arisen in which it is only ethical to blow the whistle.  Murders, scams, and outright lying are things that people need to be made aware of.

However, Assange’s actions in regards to the leaking of classified military documents have crossed many lines, both legal and moral.  It is unethical for him to get actively involved in foreign affairs and then feel victimized by prosecution for crimes he committed abroad.  Furthermore, it is unethical for him to make decisions that highly affect the status of wars when he knows nothing about war, especially about American just wars (whether people agree with the Iraq War or not, the U.S. has an obligation to rebuild a country it broke).  Regardless of mistakes that countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Afghanistan, and Iraq have made, their current governments and militaries could never be anywhere near as bad as the people they are fighting today.

Julian Assange has done good work in the past that is a credit to journalism.  His recent work however—work which he and his supporters have vehemently defended—has caused incredible harm.  This shows the change in a man who started a once good organization, now taking himself too seriously as prolific journalist—too seriously as a hero—rather than a servant of the people.  The truth is that Assange, in his quest to be the first to get the big, juicy scoop, has unknowingly lost himself in his career and become a servant for terror.  Many of his supporters cry over and over again, “Don’t shoot the messenger!”  Their basis for the argument and their chosen figure of speech is faulty; it’s not right to shoot the messenger when all he is doing is delivering the message—his job.  However, when the messenger eavesdrops on a conversation he knows absolutely nothing about, on a topic he has absolutely no expertise in, and the messenger makes a situation incredibly worse, then he has done wrong and can’t realistically expect to be patted on the back.

Nonetheless, there still is hope for Assange.  He needs to acknowledge that he has done harm to the international community, to militaries engaged in wars whose end goals are for the greater good, and to fledgling democratic governments struggling to build their future.  He needs to acknowledge that he allowed his selfishness and motivation to be the leading journalist get in the way of his true objectives.  Lastly, he needs to promise that his journalistic abilities will from now on be put to helping people in need, as he has done in the past.

END

Monday, December 27, 2010

Why Wikileaks is a threat to International Security and Julian Assange is a traitor

By Zach Foster

What happens when private citizens go abroad and disrupt the affairs of foreign nations?  If they go abroad and break any laws or codes whatsoever, they will be at the mercy of the country whose jurisdiction they are in.  In 1860 the filibuster (paramilitary pirate) William Walker, notorious for assembling private armies and attempting to conquer numerous Latin American regions to establish republics over which he would be the sovereign, was arrested and executed by the Honduran government.  He violated their laws with his presence in their country as a foreign invader with public intent to overthrow the sovereign government.  In 1838 Samuel Lount, an American citizen and native of Pehnnsylvania, was executed by the Royal Canadian government.  He got involved in Canadian politics and led an armed uprising in 1837.  Jamaican citizen Edward Nathaniel Bell was executed in 2001 for the murder of a Virginia police officer.  Clyde Lee Conrad, a US Army soldier, was arrested in 1990 by German authorities and sentenced to life in prison for spying on NATO for the People’s Republic of Hungary.

What did these individuals have in common?  Each of them got involved with the affairs of other nations, violating their laws, and being rightfully subjected to their laws and jurisdiction.  Has Julian Assange, the editor-in-chief of Wikileaks, commited any offenses against foreign governments as a private citizen?  Has Julian Assange betrayed his own country?  The answer to both is yes.

Upon being accused by the international community of treason, including a great many Americans outraged by the leaking of hundreds of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan War documents, Assange has complained publicly in protest of such accusations that he is an Australian, not a United States citizen, and thus not guilty of treason.  The fact remains that he is, though it must be admitted that most people calling him a traitor have been passionately name-calling without knowing the basis of his treason.

Let it be known that, while Assange is guilty, he is by no means the only one guilty, for he is simply the tip of the iceberg.  While there are countless moles working toward the success of Wikileaks, Assange must fulfill his leadership role as editor-in-chief and take responsibility for the illegally leaked documents.  As editor-in-chief, Assange personally approves the content that is posted on the site.  Assange’s repeated approval of posting classified documents from the Iraq and Afghan wars marks him as a traitor to his own country, Australia, which participated in the Coalition of the Willing for five years, and continues to participate in the Afghan War coalition with over one thousand troops in the country, rebuilding the infrastructure, aiding the democratic government, and fighting the Taliban insurgents.  Section 80.12 of the Australian Criminal Code defines treason in several paragraphs.  Assange is guilty of treason according to paragraphs d, e, f, and h.

"A person commits an offence, called treason, if the person: (d) levies war, or does any act preparatory to levying war, against the Commonwealth; or (e) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist, an enemy: (i) at war with the Commonwealth, whether or not the existence of a state of war has been declared; and (ii) specified by Proclamation made for the purpose of this paragraph to be an enemy at war with the Commonwealth; or (f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist: (i) another country; or (ii) an organisation; that is engaged in armed hostilities against the Australian Defence Force; or (h) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph and manifests that intention by an overt act."

In war, critical information can be more valuable to an army than regiments of soldiers.  The historically famous Prussian General Carl von Clausewitz, author of On War, writes in Book I Chapter 6: “By the word ‘information’ we denote all the knowledge which we have of the enemy and his country.”  Military strategist Sun Tzu writes of the value of information in chapter 13 of The Art of War.  Sun Tzu writes “Thus, what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge.  Knowledge of the enemy's dispositions can only be obtained from other men.”  He also writes “Hence the use of spies, of whom there are five classes: (1) Local spies; (2) inward spies; (3) converted spies; (4) doomed spies; (5) surviving spies” and “Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.”  The most recent local/inward spy of military intelligence aiding Wikileaks was Army PFC Bradley Manning.  While Assange is neither responsible for Manning’s actions not did he directly influence them, he did peruse the classified documents and approve their posting.

Among the hundreds of thousands of classified military documents posted by Wikileaks in recent years for the world to see were memos and after action reports detailing the names and numbers of military units, detailed descriptions of combat and other counterinsurgency operations, and most critically, the names of Iraqi/Afghan soldiers and policemen and, most unfortunately, the names of local civilians who served as informants for Coalition troops as well as the democratic Iraqi/Afghan authorities.  This was a devastating blow to the war efforts and even more painful for Iraq and Afghanistan.  These documents released online have now given “a hundred ounces of silver” (Sun Tzu) in rich information to the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other insurgents fighting against Coalition troops and the governments of Iraq and/or Afghanistan.  If a blow was dealt to Coalition troops, then a blow was also dealt to Australian military forces, as they frequently work side by side with US and Afghan troops to this day.

How has this helped these insurgents and terrorists?  They now know exactly which military units are operating where, as well as what part of operations they play in Enduring Freedom and New Dawn (then Iraqi Freedom), knowledge on how they fight in battle (so that they can be fought more effectively and ferociously), the IDENTITIES of indigenous soldiers and police officers so that they can be tracked down and “executed” (murdered), and the identities of CIVILIAN informers and partners in rebuilding the country, so that they can be “executed” (murdered, “made examples of”), thus severing vital information that would have gone to Coalition troops and government authorities.  The Australian military was an active participant in Operation Iraqi Freedom for five years and continues to be an active participant in Operation Enduring Freedom (the Afghanistan War).

Let us pay closer attention to the language used by Sun Tzu and von Clausewitz.  They both elaborate on how information can hurt the enemy.  But wait!  The information posted by Wikileaks helped terrorists and hurt the Coalition which includes the Australian military.  Assange is an Australian citizen!

Continued in Part 2

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

The New Iraqi Government

By Hillary Clinton

I congratulate Iraq’s political leaders on forming a new, inclusive government that respects the will of the Iraqi people, reflects the nation’s diversity, and demonstrates a commitment to democratic ideals. This government is a testament to the desire of Iraqis to settle their differences through free debate and an open exchange of ideas. Iraq’s leaders must now take the next steps to tackle the many important challenges still facing their nation and realize a brighter future for all Iraqis.

The United States will continue working with our Iraqi partners at each stage to build a strong, long-lasting relationship between our countries that promotes security and prosperity in Iraq, and stability throughout the region. Our partnership is founded on mutual respect and mutual interest as we work to achieve shared goals. With the new government in place, we look forward to expanding our economic and security relationship, promoting cooperation on science, education, and health, strengthening the rule of law and transparent governance, deepening our cultural exchanges, and improving our partnership in all the areas laid out in our Strategic Framework Agreement. We will also continue helping Iraq take up its increasing role as a constructive member of the international community.

The formation of this government is a milestone in the emergence of the new Iraq. It constitutes a resounding rejection of the extremists who sought to derail the democratic process and sow discord among Iraqis. Iraq is a great nation with a promising future, and we will stand shoulder to shoulder with the new government to help our Iraqi friends build on what they have already achieved.