Today, the New York Times has a story
about Ron Paul, his movement and the progress Paul supporters have made in
reshaping the Republican Party. Typical of what you might expect from the NYT,
it says Paul supporters are “crashing” the party. Reason’s Brian Doherty sets
them straight:
NYT:
In Minnesota, Paulites stormed the
Republican gathering in St. Cloud last weekend, bumping aside two conventional
Republican candidates to choose one of their own, Kurt P. Bills, a high school
economics teacher, to challenge Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, this fall.
Backers of Mr. Paul, a Republican
congressman from Texas, crashed Republican conventions in Iowa, Maine,
Minnesota and Nevada in recent weeks, snatching up the lion’s share of delegate
slots for the Republican National Convention in Tampa this August, a potential
headache for the national party and its presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney.
Reason/Doherty:
It’s not “crashing,” New York Times. These
conventions are open to Republicans of all sorts to follow the rules and vote
as they wish. Winning elections on any level is not “crashing.” It’s succeeding
at politics, which the Ron Paul people are proving unexpectedly good at. Ahem,
OK, back to the Times‘s wisdom:
NYT:
And Paulite candidates for Congress are
sprouting up from Florida to Virginia to Colorado, challenging sitting
Republicans and preaching the gospel of radically smaller government, an end to
the Federal Reserve, restraints on Bush-era antiterrorism laws and a pullback
from foreign military adventures.
“I’d call it a strict constitutional
approach,” said Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky and Ron Paul’s son.
“And I think it’s spreading.”
No comments:
Post a Comment